Since the time I got my senses
& started using my limited mental faculties, I have been hearing about the
famous “Tryst with Destiny” speech made by our first PM from the
parapets of Red Fort on the midnight of 14th/15th August
1947. Mostly, I have heard about the speech from the media who do not forget to
air it every 15th August, 26th January and 14th
November. Of course, he was blessed with the Gift of the Gab.
But only gift of gab doesn’t always work…it is the substance in the
person and his/her ideas/vision, which make people sit up and take notice of
the person. India
has seen its share of leaders ever since and many will remain immortal for us.
In the last decade, India
has seen a transition. The biggest change was noticed in the behaviour of
the Indian public. It had become aware
and concerned to the political class of India. May be it was because we saw Governments of two extreme
ideologies and Indian public has become smart enough to make the difference
in terms of the ‘deliverables’.
While the last decade has created
a sense of pride and despondency both, it
also would be known for the emergence of one man who has time and again been ‘COVERED’
by media. I am referring to Narendra Modi. When I say covered, media
covered Modi MOSTLY in the context of 2002 Gujrat riots. It tried to create a
demon out of a man (thanks to its neutral interviews of known Modi bashers like
Teesta Sheetalvad but amazingly it never interviewed
people who questioned Ms. Seethalvad).
Did the media succeed? I guess
not, because had it been so then media
would have forgotten him after a while but they simply could not. Every discussion on democracy continues to
be linked to Gujarat and Modi. What made
the matters worse for the mainstream media was the relentless unequivocal unsolicited
support of Indians from across the country for the man. This is not a sheer illusion. It can be verified on social network
sites like Twitter, FB etc. May be this was also one reason which made the
UPA government embark upon its ambitious initiative to quell democracy by banning these
sites. It did not succeed!
Modi is a rare politician. Rare, not because of his devotion to
serve india or not rare because of the kind of support he gets BUT
he is rare BECAUSE despite media not highlighting his achievements in
the state, the country still knows all about it. Isn’t it rare to be a
politician, not supported by mainstream media, to enjoy support
from across the country?
Here social media came to his
rescue and being the techsavvy that he is, he utilized the benefits with open
arms and who benefited the most?-our
country and we the people. This is simply because we too could start
DREAMING of a strong nation under a strong leader.
Nation wants a road map. It wants
successful case studies which can be replicated across. In such a background, Mr. Modi “faced The Nation” on 31st August,
2012. Popular as Modi Hangout, it created a wave of excitement amongst
people. The man was there himself ready to take on questions of people and
answer them.
Which other politican has done
so? In fact the current PM, if I can say so, literally shied away from the call
of Mr. Advani to participate in a public debate on the eve of 2009 election! But
then Modi is head strong and different.
Of course, during the Hang Out, the questions varied
from secularism to Manesar and then back to Gujrat and Modi answered them ( the
writer attended the session little late only to hear his comments on Gujrat but
good old twitter came to his rescue with live tweets of people during the
session). Now many people will raise the question that Modi used the platform
as a election propaganda. So be it, what’s wrong in it?
Isn’t Congress going all over the place with their promise to Gujarat electorate and media covering it too? But the
same media conveniently forgot to mention Modi’s highlights. This is wrong and
unethical to people!
While world wide from US congressional Committee to Japan has woken up
to the sheer persona and VISION of this man, but back home , many like
Nitish Kumar, other ‘secular’ politicians , think tanks and media, do not think so. They have not been able to
move on from 2002 (not because of any humane thoughts but rather address their
own objectives). In such a situation, such hangouts are required!
In view of rampant corruption
& loot of tax payers’ money as evidenced in last 8 years, India needs motivation! it needs a new “Tryst With Destiny” and
may be the road map will emerge from Gujrat. May be it is time to rephrase the
word Motivation with MODIvation,
at least million in India
think so!
Jaideep,
ReplyDeleteJust one question and please dont compare with any other politicians or parties.
IF MODI EVER BECOMES THE PM, WILL HE BE SECULAR AND MODERN IN HIS OUTLOOK?
Dear JK
ReplyDeleteAt the outset, let me thank you for your comment &time taken i reading the blog.
i frankly feel that Yes he would be secular and modern. i have the following reasons for the same :
1) Ghulam Mohd. Vastanvi,a revered darul al uloom head himself said that Modi has wroed for the development of Gujarat. later he tried to rephrase under pressure of muslim community and media.
2) during his sadbhanva fasts, muslims came to support him
3) muslims in gujrat have said that they too have prospered
4) not a single incident of any oppression against muslims in Gujrata since 2002.
5) he never supported Amit Shah & maya kodnani , the day they were named as accused.
when a development project is undertaken, it can not be targeted to one community. i frankly feel that he would be a secular leader though it will take time to make this opinion strong.